Previous Related Posts:
Revolting Justice Scalia Urges Tax Revolt
Supreme Court McCutcheon Ruling on Elections
SCOTUS Brings Back Jim Crow
Republicans Attack Chief Justice Roberts Over Obamacare
Take Two Aspirin and SCOTUS in the Morning
Eatin' Broccoli with the Supremes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Supreme Court ruled last Thursday that "buffer zones" around abortion clinics in Massachusetts shouldn't include public sidewalks. The ruling was in favor of "free speech" by the so-called "Abortion Counselors" who stand outside clinics with pictures of dead babies while screaming Bible verses at women seeking medical procedures.
From the Boston Globe
The US Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously struck down a Massachusetts law that banned protesters within 35 feet of abortion clinics, ruling that the law infringed upon the First Amendment rights of antiabortion activists.
The decision effectively overturns about 10 fixed-buffer-zone laws across the country, from San Francisco to Portland, Maine, but offers a framework for more limited restrictions around clinic demonstrations, legal experts said.
“They’ve approved the idea of this kind of law, just not the mechanism,” said Jessica Silbey, a Suffolk University Law School professor. “It was too broad.”
Attorney General Martha Coakley, whose office defended the law in arguments before the court, said the decision left intact part of the law banning deliberate obstruction of clinic entrances.
“We will utilize all of the tools we have available to protect everyone from harassment, threats, and physical obstruction,” said Coakley, adding that her office’s Civil Rights Division was prepared to issue injunctions against “those who would threaten or harass.”
Supreme Court rules against abortion clinic buffer zones from behind its own buffer zone http://t.co/HtE80d5pva
— Amanda Terkel (@aterkel) June 26, 2014
Supreme Court buffer: RT @samsteinhp: Buffer zones for me but not for thee http://t.co/T3EtpQLTI2… pic.twitter.com/gUGzI7I0Po
— Faiz (@fshakir) June 26, 2014
SCOTUS: public streets and sidewalks beat the Internet and cable news pic.twitter.com/cFLrR5IZTP
— Ryan J. Reilly (@ryanjreilly) June 26, 2014
~~~~~~~
Jessica Valenti in The Guardian
The supreme court's decision is not as unanimous as it may seem, and it is not the end: pro-choice activists are expressing outrage, sharing stories and organizing on the Twitter hashtag #protectthezone, and Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards says that the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund of Massachusetts is "already working with legislature on a new bill to protect women from harassment".
But for the women seeking abortions in the days and weeks to come - and for the providers, workers and volunteers who put their lives on the line every day to ensure women have access to safe medical care - this ruling will impact them immediately. It will make women less safe, doctors and clinic workers more fearful, and violent harassers emboldened. This is not the "free speech" we're fighting for.
#SCOTUS abortion buffer zone ruling protects a gauntlet of horror | Jessica Valenti http://t.co/MP4Aw8Ie23 via @guardian
#protectthezone
— Madame Crab (@madamecrab) June 27, 2014
There have been 200+ incidents of bombing/arson at clinics, but #SCOTUS is stripping abortion providers of protection #ProtectTheZone
— National NOW (@NationalNOW) June 27, 2014
#SCOTUS just ruled in favour of the crazy people running after you with a plastic uterus when you go into an abortion clinic. GREAT.
— Elizabeth Plank (@feministabulous) June 26, 2014
Sure wish this #SCOTUS ruling were around when protestors have to adhere to "free speech zones" and get pepper sprayed...#protectthezone
— Brienne of Snarth (@femme_esq) June 26, 2014
I have to say, the unanimous thing threw me. Dear clinics, get your cameras ready and your injunctions prepped… #protectthezone
— Robin Marty (@robinmarty) June 26, 2014
The ancient Supremes forgot that people like Eric Rudolph ever existed - but save the Smart Phones! #SCOTUS #Abortion
— Jeanne K. (@SnarkAmendment) June 26, 2014
Honestly, if crazy people were shouting at you on your way into Church, this buffer zone case would have been decided differently.
— Elie Mystal (@ElieNYC) June 26, 2014
Coming soon: combining open carry with clinic protests. For freedom! What could go wrong? #SCOTUS #protectthezone
— rabid child (@rabid_child) June 26, 2014
#SCOTUSlogic RT @senatorlarry: @JillFilipovic Harassment is counseling just like money is speech.
— Khadijah M. Britton (@KMBTweets) June 26, 2014
The MA buffer zone is necessary, upholds public safety and free speech, and women need it. #protectthezone pic.twitter.com/UV8Wtffm1F
— Planned Parenthood (@PPact) June 26, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment