Showing posts with label killing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label killing. Show all posts

Sunday, July 19, 2015

Chattanooga Mourns Military Deaths

 photo ChattanoogaSTrong.jpg

On Thursday, July 16, 2015, a lone shooter went on a rampage in Chattanooga, Tennessee, targeting Military Recruitment offices. When it was over half the city and state was suddenly on lockdown, and the entire world was watching.

Four Marines died that day, while a wounded Navy Reservist succumbed to his wounds a few days later. A total of six people died, including the shooter, who was killed by police on the scene.

Chattanooga is my hometown, and it is no exaggeration that this crime put all Tennesseans in a state of shock. I had just been at Erlanger hospital that morning for short procedure. After that my husband and I drove home past the Lee Highway recruitment center, just remarking on what a pretty day it was and how green the trees were, and chatting about what to have for breakfast. After a leisurely meal we went home and five minutes later discovered that the shootings had occurred, the hospital was on lockdown, and police were in a manhunt for the killer on Amnicola Highway near our son's college, Chattanooga State. And people were possibly dead.















Later I would find out that the shooter, Mohammad Youssuf Abdulazeez, attended my alma mater, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, just a few miles from where the four Marines were shot, and where my youngest is working towards a similar Engineering degree. He attended high school with my future son-in-law, who owns a copy of the Yearbook in which he wrote “My name causes national security alerts. What does yours do? -Hijabman.”

If this shooter had wanted just to kill citizens, he could have shot at cars on the highway, or shot at students and families on the Riverwalk, or shot through the windows of any restaurant. But he clearly targeted the military and the police. He had a plan - we could all see that. This wasn't a random crime, but an act of terrorism.

We still don't know everything about him, but we know that he lived among us as a Chattanoogan all his life and then one day, for whatever twisted reason, he woke up and decided to kill regular folks only because they wore military uniforms. For someone who didn't want to be judged by his own name, it is the ultimate act of selfish hypocrisy.

 photo Chattanooga-Marines-ChattTimes.jpg





From CNN
People who knew Abdulazeez were stunned to hear he was the man who sprayed a military recruiting center at a strip mall with bullets, then drove seven miles to assault Navy Operational Support Center Chattanooga. He killed a sailor and four Marines, and wounded two more people, before being killed by police.
Friends described Abdulazeez as a once-devoted, disciplined mixed-martial-arts fighter; a top student known for smarts, charm and humor; and a devout Muslim who kept in touch with his roots in the Middle East.
The FBI hasn't released much information on Abdulazeez, saying it doesn't yet know what motivated the bloodshed but it is working on an assumption. "We will treat this as a terrorism investigation until it can be determined that it is not," FBI Special Agent Edward Reinhold said.























Saturday, May 2, 2015

Six Baltimore Police Officers Indicted by Prosecutor Marilyn Mosby

 photo Baltimore-FreddieGrayIndictment.png

Previous Related Post:
Baltimore Burning Over Death of Freddie Gray

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It was an epic day for justice in Baltimore, Maryland, when State Prosecutor Marilyn Mosby stepped up to a microphone and stunned the world by announcing the indictment of six officers charged with the death of Freddie Gray.



 photo ba7b84b7-2021-4810-a3f2-a851d24b9eb1.jpg

 photo Baltimore-FreddieGrayIndictment2.png





From the Baltimore Sun
State's Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby charged the driver of the van with second-degree murder and the other officers with offenses that included involuntary manslaughter, vehicular manslaughter, second-degree assault, false imprisonment and misconduct in office. The officers were taken into custody Friday and released on bail.
"These charges are an important step in getting justice for Freddie," said Richard Shipley, stepfather of the 25-year-old Gray, who died April 19, one week after he was injured in police custody.
. . . After weeks of tension and occasional violence, it felt as if many exhaled in relief Friday. Gray had become the focus of massive demonstrations, here and in other cities, as the latest in a string of African-American men who died during confrontations with police.
The case stood in stark contrast to others across the nation in which police officers were cleared of wrongdoing in the deaths of black men. Grand juries declined to indict the officer who put a chokehold on Eric Garner in Staten Island, N.Y., or the officer who fatally shot Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo.

From Jennifer Bendery on Huffington Post

Who Is This Objectively Badass Attorney Running The Freddie Gray Investigation?
. . . Mosby's news marks a huge turning point for people around the country demanding justice for yet another black man killed by police, for a city torn apart by the drug war and economic disparity, and for Mosby herself.
She was just four months into her job when she was tasked last month with investigating Gray's death. She had never held elected office before November. And at 35, Mosby is the youngest chief prosecutor of any district.
Those details gave city residents reason to doubt her abilities, something even her biggest supporters have conceded. Before her current job, Mosby had been counsel for Liberty Mutual Insurance for three years and an assistant state's attorney for five years.
On Friday, though, Mosby emerged as the voice that so many in Baltimore needed to hear. She gave a detailed description of what happened to Gray the day he was arrested and said officers ignored his requests for medical attention. She let the findings speak for themselves.

Huffington Post Headline 5-2-2015

 photo c3454794-8c61-4292-a6bf-96f13c2f2bbd.png













Monday, November 24, 2014

Rudy Guiliani Blames Black People for #Ferguson

 photo rudolph_giuliani_ap.jpg

In a game of "change the subject," Ex-New York Mayor Rudy Giuiliani appeared on NBC's Meet the Press and stated vehemently that the REAL problem these days is "black on black violence," which has nothing to do with the topic he was discussion, which was Ferguson, Missouri, in which a WHITE cop shot down a black unarmed kid, which has led to white police harrassing black protestors.

From MSNBC
The conversation erupted when “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd began discussing the disproportion of white police forces to the communities they serve in areas across the U.S. aside from Ferguson, including Newark, New Jersey and El Paso, Texas. ”All of those places could become future Fergusons,” Todd said.

Giuliani quickly pivoted the conversation, arguing “the fact is, I find it very disappointing that you’re not discussing the fact that 93% of blacks in America are killed by other blacks. We’re talking about the exception here.”

Georgetown Professor Michael Eric Dyson chimed in, saying “First of all, most black people who commit crimes against other black people go to jail. Number two, they are not sworn by the police department as an agent of the state to uphold the law. So in both cases, that’s a false equivalency that the mayor has drawn, which has exacerbated tensions deeply embedded in American culture.”

...“What about the poor black child that is killed by another black child? Why aren’t you protesting that?” Giuliani asked.
“Those people go to jail!” Dyson fired back.

“White police officers won’t be there if you weren’t killing each other 70% of the time,” Giuliani added, as Todd attempted to ease the heated volley.

“This is a defense mechanism of white supremacy at work in your mind, sir,” Dyson replied.



















Sunday, August 31, 2014

Child Kills Gun Instructor with Uzi

 photo de81a2ec-72ed-40b3-9fd5-d3dd1c9c9dc4.jpg

Some idiot parents took their nine-year-old daughter to a gun range in the Arizona desert, where she was encouraged to fire an UZI assault weapon at a target. When the instructor put the weapon on automatic, the child couldn't handle the recoil and accidentally shot the teacher, blowing off his head.

This death brought to you by the #NRA and the #GOP in 'Merica.



From CNN
Charles Vacca was accidentally shot in the head as he instructed the 9-year-old girl how to fire an Uzi, an Israeli-made 9mm submachine gun. As she pulled the trigger, the gun jumped out of her left hand toward Vacca, who was standing beside her.
"To put an Uzi in the hands of a 9-year-old ... is extremely reckless, " CNN law enforcement analyst Tom Fuentes said.
Gun experts contacted by CNN on Wednesday said young children should be taught to shoot with single-shot firearms rather than submachine guns.
. . . Chief Deputy Mohave County Attorney Jace Zack told CNN on Wednesday that prosecutors didn't foresee criminal charges.
The Mohave County Sheriff's Office said the girl was with her parents. The three reside in New Jersey.
Asked about the culpability of the girl's parents, he said: "We have considered the parents, but if anyone was culpable it would be the instructor for putting a deadly weapon in her hands."

The owner of the Gun Range defended the girl's right to shoot an Uzi, because it was on the child's "bucket list." Now since when do 9-year-olds have a "bucket list?" Do gun nuts really believe the stuff they spout day after day?

All In With Chris Hayes Transcript, via Daily Kos

Chris Hayes: "... you told a reporter that a 5 year old can shoot a 22 if they have their parents consent. Could a five year old also conceivably shoot an uzi...?"

SS: "...we don't let anybody enter the range -- except on the Eddie Eagle program... -- unless they're eight years old or older -- and we grow some pretty big eight year olders out here in Arizona...

... This was a very mature young lady, and it's something she wanted to do and her parents were treating her. You know, this was a big -- something that was high on her bucket list to do and her parents took her out to do what she was gonna do...

... It's something she did, it's a tragedy and my heart goes out to her...

… We're a very tight knit group here. It's more like family. I don't want any of my people to stub their toes, let alone get killed in the process, you know it's heartbreaking."

CH: "... why would you let an eight year old shoot an uzi? I mean what's the possible upside? The downside is so horribly clear. What do you say to people that just look at this and their jaws are on the floor?"

SS: "Well, you know I tell you we've had probably 100,000 people shoot on our two ranges combined, and we've had of that probably 1500 to 2000 have been kids. The kids rent a lot of automatic weapons, we do birthday parties for children here, we do bachelor and bachelorette parties...

... we've got first aid kits and the god-darned things are brand new. Never had an injury in the place."


















Sunday, August 24, 2014

Lies of Darren Wilson ~ No Broken Eye Socket and No Police Report

 photo blank-paper.jpg

Previous Related Posts:
Racist Rescue for Darren Wilson with @GoFundMe
Monday Night Mayhem in Ferguson
Heading to #Fergustan ~ Gov. Calls Out National Guard
Ferguson Update: Shooter Identified, Tanks Return
Journalists Attacked and Arrested in Ferguson
Ferguson Missouri Uses Militarized Police on Protestors

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Twitter was abuzz last week after material was released saying that Michael Brown had given police officer Darren Wilson an eye-socket fracture during their tussle through the window of a police car. Somehow Darren Wilson supporters thought that would mitigate or explain the way he shot the young man down in anger or pain or whatever.

The source was This post by Gateway Pundit
The Gateway Pundit can now confirm from two local St. Louis sources that police Officer Darren Wilson suffered facial fractures during his confrontation with deceased 18 year-old Michael Brown. Officer Wilson clearly feared for his life during the incident that led to the shooting death of Brown. This was after Michael Brown and his accomplice Dorian Johnson robbed a local Ferguson convenience store.
. . . Local St. Louis sources said Wilson suffered an “orbital blowout fracture to the eye socket.” This comes from a source within the Prosecuting Attorney’s office and confirmed by the St. Louis County Police.



The bogus eye report was accompanied by what appeared to be some type of diagram or X-ray of Wilson's head injury.

 photo xcranial-.jpg

Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs exposed that the picture wasn't connected to Wilson at all, but was lifted from a website and edited:
And there’s more evidence that Hoft is trying to pull a fast one again; here is the original image posted at the AAPOS site, showing a CT scan of a blowout fracture (on the left), compared to the image posted at Gateway Pundit by Hoft (on the right):

 photo fb4077ce-db07-4717-b06f-2f8d949c6df8.jpg

Notice the difference? In the version posted by Jim Hoft, the text at bottom right that says “UNIV OF IOWA” has been crudely erased. Caught you, Jim.
Was Hoft trying to mislead his readers into thinking this was the actual X-ray (or CT scan) of Darren Wilson? His text does not make it clear it wasn’t Wilson’s CT scan — and the words “UNIV OF IOWA” have been blacked out, quite deliberately.
If Hoft’s intent was to mislead, it worked. All over Twitter and right wing blogs, the wingnuts are raving about “Darren Wilson’s X-ray” that shows a fractured eye socket — but this is just a generic example image of an unknown person’s CT scan.

CNN also reported that the whole story about the "Orbital Socket" injury wasn't true.

From CNN Transcript August 21, 2014
LEMON: OK. We're learning some information regarding officer Darren Wilson's supposed injuries that we have been discussing and talking about here.

One of those injuries that has not been reported by CNN, but it's making its way around other media organizations and also on the Internet -- here's the thing. So according to a source close to the investigation, the officer, Darren Wilson, did go to the hospital after the altercation and the shooting death of Michael Brown.

He did have X-rays done. He had a swollen face. But the X-rays for a broken or a torn eye socket came back negative. That source says it is not true at all. He did not have a torn eye socket. And so he is saying that unequivocally -- he unequivocally denies that, saying it did not happen. But he did have a swollen face. He did go for X-rays. And that is the very latest on that. But he said obviously there was some sort of scuffle, Brooke, because, you know, it was swollen. But that eye socket tear, whatever, it's called a tear or rupture or fracture to the orbital lobe -- Brooke.

BALDWIN: OK. OK, so a source saying he did not have this broken or fractured eye socket.

LEMON: Did not. Did not.



That won't come as a surprise to anyone who has followed this case, since Wilson is seen casually walking around Mike Brown's dead body in the street instead of holding onto his own eye and screaming in pain. No paramedics are seen giving him assistance either.









~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Non-Report

The Ferguson Police Department finally released a "report" on the death of Michael Brown, but there are some major problems. It is barely a report at all - just a one page of fill-in-the-blanks boilerplate with nothing attached to it.

As President Obama might say, quoting Gertrude Stein, "There's no there there." It's a non-report report.

View it here, via the ACLU



From The Wire
The incident report the Ferguson Police Department has on file has little more than the who, where and when of the shooting. It doesn't say what happened, it doesn't say how, and it wasn't even reviewed by a supervisor until 10 days after Michael Brown died. The report was given final approval on August 20.
. . . It's clear now that Ferguson police knew then that they didn't have the incident report they were asked to release. MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell argued that Jackson essentially admitted there was no incident report last week when he said "we've pretty much given you every bit of information that we have now — I don't think there's anything else that we have to give out."

Lawrence O'Donnell did indeed predict that there wouldn't be much of a report, and his reasoning was that Darren Wilson would be told by the Police Union attorney not to incriminate himself by putting the story of that day into writing, in effect, setting himself up to plead the fifth amendment. However, that is little consolation to the family of Michael Brown, or the citizens of Ferguson, or the country for that matter, that Darren Wilson is planning to avoid any responsibility for killing Michael Brown.









From Yahoo News
The two-page document, which the Ferguson Police Department released only after pressure from journalists and civil liberties advocates, is largely redacted or left blank. The most egregious omissions are the victim’s name and a description of the offense – the fatal shooting of Brown.
“They are breaking the law,” said Tony Rothert, legal director of the ACLU of Missouri.
The report, obtained by Yahoo News through the Missouri Sunshine Law, lists only the date, time and location. Fields for the type of incident, name of the complainant, and a summary of the circumstances are redacted.
. . . Missouri’s Sunshine Law states law enforcement agencies must promptly provide incident reports that include among other things, “name of the victim and immediate facts and circumstances surrounding the initial report of a crime or incident.”






#Ferguson ~ The Shocking Death of Kajieme Powell

 photo 7e05eecc-4f0c-4dd1-a778-736d7ad16a57.jpg

Another man was gunned down this week in Missouri, this time by St. Louis cops. Kajieme Powell had stolen several items including canned drinks and a honey bun from a local market, and was talking to himself and others on the street. A bystander started filming him while talking on the phone and was shocked when cops rolled up and shot the obviously mentally ill man several times at close range.

WARNING: This video is disturbing and violent!



They say the man had a knife, but it's not clear in the video, and he was obviously outnumbered by cops. So why the overkill once again while the whole world is watching? It would seem this is just another day in the St. Louis area, and the only plan they have is "shoot to kill."

From New Republic:
If you watch the video, there’s no denying that the introduction of police was a catalyst that rapidly turned a sad and touchy situation into a violent tragedy.
. . . Powell had a knife—Police Chief Sam Dotson described it as a steak knife. But he was not wielding it in the way officers claimed (or in the way it may have felt to them in the moment). He was not two or three feet away, but perhaps eight or nine. He wasn’t charging hard or issuing threats. To the contrary, he was demanding to be shot.
But that doesn’t mean the police needed to oblige him. It's hard to watch the video and not conclude that there should’ve been some safe way to preserve his life.

When you watch the video, notice that one cop rolls him over and attempts to put cuffs on him AFTER death. It's creepy and wrong in every possible way.These cops have no respect for the dead, which they proved with Michael Brown as well, leaving him bleeding in the road for a very long time after that shooting, then loading him into a van instead of an ambulance. What is wrong with them?

And when you read the list of tweets, it's also weird that the Mayor of St. Louis is named "Slay." Sometimes I feel as if I'm having a symbolic NRA-induced nightmare.




















Saturday, January 12, 2013

Tennessean Yeager Threatens to Kill People Over Gun Control

Photobucket

Update: James Yeager in videos below has had his gun license suspended by the State of Tennessee.

Via Channel 5 News
Tennessee Department of Safety and Homeland Security has suspended the handgun carry permit of a local man who threatened to "start killing people" to protect his Second Amendment right.

In a statement released Friday officials said they had suspended the handgun carry permit of James Yeager, CEO of Tactical Response based on "material likelihood of risk of harm to the public".

"The number one priority for our department is to ensure the public's safety. Mr. Yeager's comments were irresponsible, dangerous, and deserved our immediate attention. Due to our concern, as well as that of law enforcement, his handgun permit was suspended immediately. We have notified Mr. Yeager about the suspension today via e-mail. He will receive an official notification of his suspension through the mail," Commissioner Bill Gibbons said.

Original "Pack Your Bags" Statement

From James Yeager of Tennessee, CEO of Tactical Response, a Tennessee company that trains people in weapon and tactical skills.
Vice President Biden is asking the president to bypass Congress and use executive privilege, executive order to ban assault rifles and to impose stricter gun control.
F**k that.
I'm telling you if that happens it's going to spark a civil war and I'll be glad to fire the first shot. I'm not puttin' up with it. You shouldn't put up with it.
And I need all you patriots to start thinking about what you’re going to do, load your damn mags, make sure your rifle’s clean, pack a backpack with some food in it and get ready to fight.
I'm not f***ing putting up with this. I am not letting my country be ruled by a dictator. I'm not letting anybody take my guns. If it goes one inch further, I'm gonna start killing people.


Previous Video Statement: On Assault Weapons Ban 

Things are looking kinda bleak for the patriots in this country. First let's talk about the reality of things because there are rumblings of a Civil War.
. . . If you're literally talkin' about a Civil War, you really are talking about becoming an insurgent. And that's how the government will look at you and that's how you'll be treated in the media. You will not be portrayed as a freedom fighter or a white knight or anything like that. You'll be viewed as a domestic terrorist, an insurgent. You won't be thought of in the popular press or popular media as anything other than a bandit, a scoundrel, and just a dishonorable person. So keep that in mind.
As far as what I'm going to do as far as the assault weapon ban? Um, I'm not given' up my guns. Period. That's my line in the sand.

Everybody has to have their line in the sand. I will not succomb.
Everybody's like "Yeah! blah blah blah," when they come to my house. Well, I'm gonna go ahead and tell ya, if we wait for 'em to come to our house, they'll start picking us off one at a time. If your whole plan is to resist by staying at home then that is no resistance at all.
We need to do things as much as we can politically. Please give money to the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action. The NRA-ILA. That is where the political money goes. You can give money to the NRA and they kinda split it all up, but if you earmark it for the ILA, then it goes right in for ads, for pro-gun ads, right into all the political stuff. I'm tellin' you - I know those guys at the ILA, I know them, they are friends of mine. They ARE freedom fighters. They are our best defense. We have to get behind them.
And I'm not sayin' that these other organizations aren't good, that's great, join 'em all.
. . . I want our elected officials to do what they swore to do when they raised their hand. But I will tell you that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights demand that we do not allow tyranny. And I see the assault weapon ban and confiscation, buyback and all that stuff, as being an absolutely unreasonable firearms restriction. The Surpreme Court has said it is an individual right. The Supreme Court said that not that long ago! An individual right. And that's where I stand with it.




Pack Your Bags Part 2: Backpeddling, Sort Of 

I stirred up a lot with the "Pack Your Bags" video, so number two here. Um, I was mad when I said it. And, uh, probably allowed my mouth to overrun my logic. But I don't retract any of my statements. I have edited the video and I cut off the end where I said I'd start shooting people.
First off, I don't need the hundreds of people who have emailed me to give me legal advice or lawyers. I didn't ask you for your f***in' opinion. I didn't ask you to clog up my go**am email. I don't need anybody to ever email or text me or call me or smoke-signal me over anything that's goin' on with the internet because I don't care. '
Now I realize there are unedited versions of the video people have stolen from me. If you're one of the people who have stolen my video and you've uploaded it onto your site, please take it down, it's my property. It's my property, take it down.
. . . I've had a flood of calls from alumni, a flood of messages. It's overwhelming. ...Visits in the store and in person. All over the place, people asking me what they should do. I don't know. But I did tell you to load your mags, make sure your guns clean, and pack a backpack. If you haven't done that, don't call me and ask me what to do next because you haven't even done the first thing I asked you to do.
People are sayin' stuff like 'It needed to be said, but you shouldn't a said it.' Well look around, who else is going to say it?
And all you f***in' fair-weather Second Amendment people tellin' me that I'm doing a f***in' disservice to the gun community by sayin' that I'm not going to stand for the tyranny? F*** YOU! Our country wasn't founded by f***in' fair-weather pu$$ies. Either you're in or you're out, and if you're out don't call yourself a go**am Second Amendment advocate. It f***in' pisses me off.
If you're not prepared to go all the way, then you're not prepared to go anywhere.
Now, I don't condone anybody doing anything rash. I do not condone anybody doing any kind of felonies up to and including aggravated assaults or murders, unless it's necessary. Right now it is not necessary.
I understand that my video was very volatile. You have no idea how many people sent me emails and texts and called me. It was like 'Right on. My sh**'s clean. My backpack is packed, you tell me when and where. You have no idea how quickly I accidentally assembled an army. I assure you, a quite formidable army.
But now is not the time yet. It is time to get ready. It is time to get ready. Start workin' out. Start stretchin'. Start practicin'. Start talkin' with your friends. Coordinating on a local basis.

I don't know really what to say to do next. I have a wait-and-see attitude about the whole thing. But I stand fast with my message. I have drawn my line in the sand. Not one more inch.



Interview with WSMV TV Reporter:

Interviewer: You've made some comments that have gotten a lot of people upset, comments about killing a lot of people.

Yeager: I didn't say I'd kill a lot of people. I said I'm going to shoot some people.

Interviewer: Okay. Why did you say that?

Yeager: What would George Washington do? What would Thomas Jefferson do? Um, it is our civic duty as citizens of this country to respond to treasonous (sic) and tyranny. It's our absolute birthright and its our responsibility.

Interviewer: So can you elaborate when you say 'shoot some people'? Because to us it sounds like a threat.

Yeager: Of course. I was angry when I made the video. And probably should have metered by words better. I am not plotting to kill any officials or anything like that. No plans to do that. But the American Revolution is not that indifferent (sic) - the things that were going on at that time are not that different from now. And I believe our forefathers would be turning over in their graves if they had any idea of what this country's become.
I don't mind paying my taxes, I'm a law-abiding citizen. But I expect my constitutional rights to be left in place. And they have been eroded, and eroded and eroded. And I've drawn a line in the sand.

Interviewer: The line that you've drawn makes some people pretty nervous.

Yeager: Good. It's time. It's time for people to be nervous.

Interviewer: They're nervous about you.

Yeager: Mm, well, I - I can understand. I'm a person of conviction and when I say things people believe me. I will reiterate - I have no plot. There's no notes on my desk about killing anybody. I was angry when I made that and those were far-fetched statements but the reality is that I feel that this country is headed for collapse in several different ways, economic as well as political.

Interviewer: Under what circumstances would you shoot somebody?

Yeager: (laughs) That's a pretty ambiguous question. Certainly in defense of life. Um, but . . . the question is, I guess, right now, in defense of liberty and what does that mean? I don't really know. I don't really know how to answer your question and even if I had a year to think about it, I don't know that I could answer it with any satisfaction
However, it will be time to shoot people when the Constitution is set on fire.
(long pause)

Interviewer: Can you explain more?

Yeager: Ask a different question.

Interviewer: Well you said it would be time to shoot people when the constitution is set on fire. Are you talking about literally somebody taking the paper document and lighting it, or what are you talking about?

Yeager: Examples of what I'm talking about are outright gun confiscation, martial law, things like that. There are things going on in this country that should not be going on, that are not legal in any sense of the word. And I know I might be loud, and I understand that I'm radical. But there are a lot of people who are far more eloquent than I am, who are more educated than I am, that agree with me.

Interviewer: Well, the attention getter is saying you're going to shoot some people.

Yeager: Right.

Interviewer: And when I hear you, I'm thinking that when someone comes to confiscate a gun at your house you're going to open fire on them?

Yeager: Yes.

Interviewer: Go through that again?

Yeager: If somebody comes to take my guns, I will shoot them.

Interviewer: Can you hear what that sounds like to people who are not of your same political opinion?

Yeager: I would hope that they would have been educated. And I hope they can read the Constitution. The Second Amendment is the most clear amendment in the entire Bill of Rights. And it says 'shall not be infringed.' It's the most clear and concise amendment that there is.

Interviewer: Talk about the reaction you've had to the YouTube posting.

Yeager: The overwhelming response has been very positive and very supportive. The detractors have threatened bodily harm to me and my family and threatened to burn my business down. Calling me all kinds of names. Calling me a Nazi and things like that. Nothing could be further from the truth. They've been very rude. Calling and making nasty threats via email and everything else. And they've disrupted my business. And that's their goal. I understand that. But, the overwhelming majority of comments have been very positive.

Interviewer: So mostly positive - what are you hearing from people?

Yeager: In my video I tell them to make sure their rifle's clean and their mags are loaded. And most of the responses I'm getting are that my rifle's clean and my mags are loaded.

Interviewer: And the people that have been saying rude and ugly things. Describe what the general tone is.

Yeager: I think the general tone seems to be certainly anger, and frustration. . . . It's funny because they tell me that I'm wrong for threatening violence but they're threatening me in the same breath.

Interviewer: What kind of threats are they, specifically?

Yeager: Saying I should be shot. My family should be killed. My house should be burnt down. Very negative things . . . about the women in my life that I won't go into detail about. But some very terrible things.

Interviewer: Do you think that these are real threats?

Yeager: Credible? Probably not, but it only takes one person to make it real.

Interviewer: Some people could say that about you.

Yeager: Yeah. You're right, and I hope they're paying attention.

Interviewer: All right, sum it up for me. Oh, there was one version up on YouTube, then it came down. The part about killing people. Then it went back up without that. Were you the one that edited that?

Yeager: Yes.

Interviewer: Okay, tell me why you did that.

Yeager: Again, I was angry when I made the video. I said some things I probably should have said differently. Um, and I realize that talking about shooting people is inflammatory. And so I took the video down, edited it and took that part out, and put it back up. It wasn't me trying to escape anything. I realize that people all ready ripped the video and put it on other sites, but I wanted to reposition myself and basically admit that I went a little too far with that.

Interviewer: Talk about the national attention that you've gotten now.

Yeager: It's pretty funny. I just got off the phone with a radio interview. MSNBC wants to speak with me. CNN has asked for an interview. You guys are here. It's been, uh, it's been a very busy day.

Interviewer: Did you expect that?

Yeager: No.

Interviewer: Okay, sum it up for me.

Yeager: Our country was founded with the basic precept that each individual person was responsible for themselves. And the government is steadily trying to take away our ability to be responsible through taxation and the erosion of the Constitution. People are tired of it.

Interviewer: You're really tired of it, huh?

Yeager: (Nods head)

Interviewer: I can tell it gets you, it just really gets you. Anything else you want to say?

Yeager: I can't think of anything.




Pack Your Bags 3: Yeager and his Attorney

Yeager: Hi, I'm here today with my friend, alumnus and attorney, Dana McLendon. In my other video I said some pretty volatile stuff, which I apologize for. I do not in any way advocate the overthrowing of the United States government. Nor do I condone any violent actions towards any elected officials. I was very angry when I made that video, and I didn't have time to reflect on it before it was put up, and I took it down very quickly but it was reposted with my original thoughts. I was mad when I said it. I apologize for letting my anger get the better of me.

But I want to make sure everybody understands is that it's not time for any type of violent action.

(Turns to lawyer) Say hello, please.

McLendon: Evenin'.

Yeager: Dana contacted me as a friend about that video and said 'hey, maybe we shoulda said some things about you know, what people should be doin' right now.' And so that's what we're here to talk about - what we need to be doing right now politically to further our cause.

McLendon: Thanks for having me on, and I do think people need to recognize that for 20 years people in the gun enthusiast industry and that kind of thing have really made some big advances. Shall issues (handgun licensing) have swept the nation. In almost every state you can get permission to carry a gun now. The laws have really gone our way for a long time. So the process works. The Legislative process tends to work. By and large we haven't done anything to burn the legislators that have trusted us with these laws, right?

So I think it's important that we have to understand that some people are afraid. And they're worried. And they want to know how they can not be unsafe. They want to feel safe. And not everybody's cut out to carry a gun. Not everybody's going to be a gun enthusiast. A lot of people are never going to be that. They just want to walk around and feel safe.

So what's happened is, there are politician's out there who are using this opportunity to kinda seduce these people into believing that they have the solution for their safety.

Yeager: Right.

McLendon: We can talk about whether there's actually any validity to that, but they're selling safety, but they're not going to be able to deliver it the way they're promising. For that reason I think it's important for people on our side of the equation to talk to their legislators, tell 'em, remind 'em, for 20 years the trend's been going in this direction. For 20 years, crime rates are dropping. For 20 years violent crime - dropping.

Now is not the time to overreact and apply a lot of reactionary policies that don't really address the problems that we're facing. So I would tell people that we're dealing with a scared population, dealing with people who don't necessarily think and feel like we do. And contact your legislators to let them know that we want them to stand fast with our rights and our privileges, and not do things that won't work. Look at doing things that might work. And have a reasonable discussion about that.

Don't overreact to every soundbyte that some politician comes on TV and says.

(snip)

Yeager: Earlier this week I made a pretty inflammatory video. Hindsight being 20-20, I shouldn't have said some of the things I said, of course. And I just want to reiterate to everyone that it's not time to shoot anybody. What it is time to do is to organize politically, contact our elected officials, and help steer this ship the direction we want it to go. It's unfortunate that things have become so volatile. But it is an opportunity for us to push forward.


Sunday, December 16, 2012

The Newtown Massacre

Photobucket



Previous Post:
Snark Amendment: Now is the Time for Gun Control
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


We are living in an era of slaughter. I admit to having thrown up my own hands against the NRA, arguing that they have too much power and it wasn't worth the risk to take them on. I'm done with that. We're living in a f***ing abbatoir, now drenched in the blood of little children. We have to do something.
~ Michael Tomasky on Daily Beast

The people who fight and lobby and legislate to make guns regularly available are complicit in the murder of those children. They have made a clear moral choice: that the comfort and emotional reassurance they take from the possession of guns, placed in the balance even against the routine murder of innocent children, is of supreme value. Whatever satisfaction gun owners take from their guns—we know for certain that there is no prudential value in them—is more important than children’s lives. Give them credit: life is making moral choices, and that’s a moral choice, clearly made.
All of that is a truth, plain and simple, and recognized throughout the world. At some point, this truth may become so bloody obvious that we will know it, too. Meanwhile, congratulate yourself on living in the child-gun-massacre capital of the known universe.
~ Adam Gopnik on The New Yorker

America has a gun problem . It's time for action. I, and my siblings,(born in the mid-sixties) grew up without bicycle helmets, and graduated sizes of car seats. Our parents used mercury thermometers, to check for fever, and we played on asphalt playgrounds. Everyone I know survived. Yet, there were accidents; So our government legislated safety guidelines. Yes, it makes sense. Cribs that collapse, cars with faulty breaks, contaminated food get recalled. Why? Because they're dangerous. However, the most dangerous, man-made instrument, whose sole purpose is to destroy; is ever evasive of thoughtful, logical legislation. There is an unbelievable disconnect here. How many more innocent Americans, need to die unnecessarily, by gunfire, before something is done? The Bradys' worked very hard to make intelligent change. We need to reinstate the assault weapon ban, close the gun show loop-holes, and hold gun manufacturers accountable. If this government can legislate benign objects; Why can't it legislate deadly weapons?
~ comment by SeaSprite23 on The New Yorker


Do We Have the Courage to Stop This?
The fundamental reason kids are dying in massacres like this one is not that we have lunatics or criminals — all countries have them — but that we suffer from a political failure to regulate guns.
. . . We even regulate toy guns, by requiring orange tips — but lawmakers don’t have the gumption to stand up to National Rifle Association extremists and regulate real guns as carefully as we do toys. What do we make of the contrast between heroic teachers who stand up to a gunman and craven, feckless politicians who won’t stand up to the N.R.A.?
As one of my Facebook followers wrote after I posted about the shooting, “It is more difficult to adopt a pet than it is to buy a gun.”
~ Nicholas D. Kristoff






We ask why there is violence in our schools, but we have systematically removed God from our schools. Should we be so surprised that schools would become a place of carnage?
~ Mike Huckabee on Fox News

Walk-Back:
Yesterday, I was on Neil Cavuto. He asked me, you know, where was God? I said, you know, we've systematically removed him from our culture, from our schools. Well, I've been barraged by people who have said that I said, well, if we just have prayer in schools, this wouldn't happen. That's not my point.
~ Mike Huckabee Walking Back his Previous Statement on Fox and Friends Saturday







~~~~~~~

It’s a fact that there is only one policy that has been shown to reduce the incidence of multiple shootings. There’s always going to be crazy people in a country of 300 million people. Only one policy has reduced these mass shootings and the number of casualties, and that is concealed carry permits. If you want to reduce the number of dead, and the number of times this is going to happen in an area, you sort of sense this, because although it’s been a long time since a school shooting, post offices, places that are gun free zones.
~ Ann Coulter on Sean Hannity








The right wing fairy tale that more concealed carry permits will reduce mass shootings is based on several flawed assumptions. The right assumed that the person who is carrying is at the ready. They assume that the individual with the gun won’t be targeted first. They also assume that the rampage shooter will have no element of surprise. They assume that those who find themselves in a mass shooting situation will be in a position to retaliate.
The idea that adding more guns to a school shooting would somehow reduce the violence defies common sense, but it is also symptomatic of where the discussion has quickly gone after the Newtown shooting.
~ Jason Easley on PoliticusUSA

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CNN Piers Morgan Transcript Dec. 14, 2012

JOHN R. LOTT, JR, AUTHOR, "MORE GUNS, LESS CRIME": I'm telling you, people can go and look up the statistics themselves. What you find is that for decades the murder rate was falling in Australia. It basically stopped falling. If you just compare the average over two decades where it's falling to what it was afterwards, it makes it look like the average before is higher than average afterwards. But if you look on a year by year basis, there wasn't that fall.

MORGAN: Why does Adam Lanza's mother, who sadly as killed by him today -- why did she need to have these three weapons?

LOTT: Can I follow-through on the Australia thing?

MORGAN: No, I want you to answer this. Why does she need to have these three weapons, legally purchased, including this semiautomatic Bushmaster. Why would a woman teacher at a kindergarten need these weapons in her home? Allowing, therefore, a clearly deranged son to take them and commit this atrocity?

LOTT: Whatever that gun looks like, it's a semiautomatic rifle. Any hunting rifle, just about, is a semiautomatic rifle. Just because it looks different on the outside doesn't mean it functions differently.

MORGAN: He fired over 100 rounds in several minutes with this apparently harmless rifle.

LOTT: Nobody said guns were harmless. Guns make it easy.

MORGAN: You just tried to make out, it's just an average old gun. He fired over 100 rounds and he killed 20 children. Twenty Children between five and 10. At what point do you gun lobby guys say, we get it? It's time for change?

LOTT: Right, it is time.

MORGAN: Time to do what?

LOTT: To get rid of some of these gun laws that cause --

MORGAN: To get rid of the gun laws?


LOTT: Look at what has happened, all these attacks this year have occurred where guns are banned. Look at the Aurora movie theater shooting.

MORGAN: What the hell has that got to do with it? Seriously? What has that got to do with it?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Saturday, December 15, 2012

Now is the Time for Gun Control

Photobucket


Immediate response from National Rifle Association: 
NO COMMENT


STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT ON SCHOOL SHOOTING IN NEWTOWN, CONNECTICUT
James S. Brady Press Briefing Room
3:15 P.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT: This afternoon, I spoke with Governor Malloy and FBI Director Mueller. I offered Governor Malloy my condolences on behalf of the nation, and made it clear he will have every single resource that he needs to investigate this heinous crime, care for the victims, counsel their families.

We’ve endured too many of these tragedies in the past few years. And each time I learn the news I react not as a President, but as anybody else would — as a parent. And that was especially true today. I know there’s not a parent in America who doesn’t feel the same overwhelming grief that I do.

The majority of those who died today were children — beautiful little kids between the ages of 5 and 10 years old. They had their entire lives ahead of them — birthdays, graduations, weddings, kids of their own. Among the fallen were also teachers — men and women who devoted their lives to helping our children fulfill their dreams.

So our hearts are broken today — for the parents and grandparents, sisters and brothers of these little children, and for the families of the adults who were lost. Our hearts are broken for the parents of the survivors as well, for as blessed as they are to have their children home tonight, they know that their children’s innocence has been torn away from them too early, and there are no words that will ease their pain.

As a country, we have been through this too many times. Whether it’s an elementary school in Newtown, or a shopping mall in Oregon, or a temple in Wisconsin, or a movie theater in Aurora, or a street corner in Chicago — these neighborhoods are our neighborhoods, and these children are our children. And we’re going to have to come together and take meaningful action to prevent more tragedies like this, regardless of the politics.

This evening, Michelle and I will do what I know every parent in America will do, which is hug our children a little tighter and we’ll tell them that we love them, and we’ll remind each other how deeply we love one another. But there are families in Connecticut who cannot do that tonight. And they need all of us right now. In the hard days to come, that community needs us to be at our best as Americans. And I will do everything in my power as President to help.

Because while nothing can fill the space of a lost child or loved one, all of us can extend a hand to those in need — to remind them that we are there for them, that we are praying for them, that the love they felt for those they lost endures not just in their memories but also in ours.

May God bless the memory of the victims and, in the words of Scripture, heal the brokenhearted and bind up their wounds.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy