Showing posts with label semantics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label semantics. Show all posts

Monday, May 13, 2013

Issa Wrong-Splains the Difference Between "Act of Terror" and "Terrorist Attack"



 photo Issa1-1.jpg

Previous Posts:
The Benghazi Political Circus
Benghazi Been-There-Done-That

The President sent a letter to the president of Libya where he didn't call it a terrorist attack even when in real time the president of Libya was calling this a pre-planned Sept. 11 terrorist attack. So I think when you look at official correspondence from the President through the acting ambassador to the president of Libya, which came out in our hearing and was testified to under oath, the words that are being used carefully -- like you just said, act of terror -- an act of terror is different than a terrorist attack. The truth is, this was a terrorist attack, this had al Qaeda at it, this came over the wall very quickly, attacked and killed two people and then later two more hours later.
~ Congressman Darrell Issa, R-California, on Fox News

Finally, an explanation why Benghazi is such a scandal!
~ Kos on Daily Kos

I need an English to GOP translator
~ BP Pgh on Daily Kos

Some days, 100 angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Other times, 101 can. But 102 may be questionable.
~ hawkseye on Daily Kos

And Issa spelled backwards is ASS I
~ maxcat06 on Daily Kos

LMAO...former car thief Darrell Issa beclowns himself again.
~ big4bluz on Mediaite

Is Fox News just showing reruns now?
~ Met on Mediaite

Double speak feeds the wingnut base.
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others".- George Orwell (Animal Farm)
~ CyberForce on Mediaite

Burning crosses or cross-shaped burnings?
~ Rev_Cocoa on Mediaite

Darrell Issa, grammatical wunderkind.
~ ThusBloggedAnderson on Talking Points Memo

"A pointless hunt for witches is completely different than a pointless witch hunt."
~ Chocko_Rocko on Talking Points Memo

Obama called it an 'act of terror' but in reality it was a 'terrorist attack' ?
IMPEACH HIM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
~ KnownUnknowns on Talking Points Memo
.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Grover Norquist in Wonderland


Photobucket

gif by snatchmescabior

Transcript Via Raw Story

Andrea Mitchell: Why were you in favor of this? This is the first tax increase Republicans have voted for in 20 years.

Grover Norquist: Because, of course, no Republican voted for a tax increase. What happened was [President Barack] Obama had this Sword of Damocles over the heads of the American people with a $5 trillion tax increase over that next decade that would happen automatically unless the House, Senate and president voted on something.

The tax increases that he insisted on, all the Republicans in the House and the Senate have voted more than once to extend the Bush tax for everyone permanently. So, the Republicans are quite clear, they want the tax cuts extended for everyone. The president insisted on taking them away from some people. That’ll hurt the economy. He got his tax increase, but he can’t claim Republican fingerprints on his tax increase.

Mitchell: (laughing) Wait a second. I mean, we’re not living in the ‘Alice in Wonderland’ world here. There is a tax increase for wealthier Americans. It’s literally a tax increase. Rates are up.

Norquist: Well, what happened yesterday is that all the rates went up and then the Republicans and the Congress together took them down for some people, not for everybody. There was an automatic tax increase, a whole series of tax increases, which were then countermanded in a second bill.




Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. The same of lies from the same old liar. He is saying black is white, up is down, and cold is hot. He could not tell the truth if the actual sword of Damocles was above him and about to chop off his fat head. This man is no longer a threat to anyone.
~ comment by Wombat Weathereaxe on Raw Story

Grover sees the world through Rove-colored glasses.
~ comment by Handy Pants on Raw Story

Shorter Norquist: "I'm relevant I tell you....RELEVANT!!!"
~ comment by Carl A. on Talking Points Memo

Ah semantics.
~ comment by jsfox on Talking Points Memo

"Well Andrea, I need to protect my paycheck."
~ comment by Jeff W. on Mediaite

~~~~~~~~~~~