From Washington Post
Obama was addressing a Democratic Party fundraiser in a private Kalorama home in Northwest Washington when Ellen Sturtz, 56, a lesbian activist, interrupted her remarks to demand that President Obama sign an anti-discrimination executive order.
. . . “One of the things that I don’t do well is this,” she said to applause from most of the guests, according to a White House transcript. “Do you understand?”
A pool report from a reporter in the room said Obama “left the lectern and moved over to the protester.” The pool report quoted Obama as saying: “Listen to me or you can take the mic, but I’m leaving. You all decide. You have one choice.”
. . . The audience responded by asking Obama to remain, according to the pool report, which quoted a woman nearby telling Sturtz, “You need to go.”
Sturtz was escorted out of the room. She said in an interview later she was stunned by Obama’s response.
“She came right down in my face,” Sturtz said. “I was taken aback.”
The interruption came less than two weeks after President Obama faced a Code Pink protester who loudly advocated for the closure of the Guantanamo Bay prison during the president's national security speech.
The president, who was making his remarks before cameras and a large audience, handled the situation differently than his wife's confrontation Tuesday night.
"This is part of free speech, is you being able to speak but also you listening and me being able to speak, alright?" Obama said upon the interruption. The president has used the tactic before when interrupted.
~ CNN Political Ticker
Attendees escorted the protester out as she yelled further, at one point identifying herself as a “lesbian looking for federal equality before I die.”
Heather Cronk, a co-director of GetEqual, a group that advocates for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals, later identified the heckler as one of its activists, Ellen Sturtz. Three other GetEqual activists were also at the event, Ms. Cronk said.
Tickets for the event ranged in price from $500 to $10,000, Democratic Party officials said.
~ New York Times
Sturtz, who was planted at the fundraiser by gay rights group GetEqual, stated that she was "taken aback" by Obama's response, because apparently the idea that she would do anything besides hand Sturtz the microphone and get her husband on the phone is surprising.
~ The Root
Notice the language Sturtz uses to describe the encounter. Rutgers Anthropology Ph.D student Donna Auston emphasizes that Sturtz’s word choice of “taken aback” is one of distinct privilege; Sturtz sees herself as above reproach in this situation. As Auston inquires, why was Sturtz surprised at Obama’s response? “Is it because you did not expect her to exercise agency? Did you not expect her to assert that she is your equal?” Auston asks. Either black women are supposed to tacitly accept maltreatment and disrespect, or when they do exercise their agency, they are branded as the “Angry Black Woman.”
The choice of words Sturtz employed indicate that she has cast the First Lady as the aggressor who over-zealously responded to reason with anger. And once you label a black woman as “angry,” you have, in essence, invalidated any response, no matter how justified or rational it may be. You can silence any challenge or dissenting thought from a black woman by even remotely alluding to this offensive stereotype.
~ Lauren Rankin on PolicyMic
. . . the moment we play the “I just couldn’t help myself ” card we shut down meaningful conversation. Yelling at someone is not “interaction.” Sure, we get noticed, but it’s easy to get noticed. A no-nonsense mom like Michelle Obama could tell you that any 2-year-old in a WalMart can get noticed just by throwing herself on the floor of the sporting goods aisle. That doesn’t mean anybody is going to take her seriously.
~ Mary Elizabeth Williams on Salon
Via Towleroad
The GetEQUAL organizers involved in the demonstration have issued the following statement.
"LGBT people in North Carolina, New Mexico, Ohio and all over the country are dehumanized in our jobs, and we are forced into the closet in order to participate in the American dream. We value the First Lady's leadership and invite her to lead the charge within the Democratic Party to end employment discrimination. President Obama has an executive order sitting on his desk that can protect a quarter of the labor force in the U.S. from workplace discrimination, we will continue engaging leaders in the Administration and the Democratic Party until President Obama fulfills a promise to our community made five years ago."
Is this how gays repay obama foreverything he has done for them?nbcnews.to/18Nwdht /via @nbcnews
— Erin Alan Houser (@vaevictus1231) June 5, 2013
Heckler demands to know from Michelle Obama why things can't be like the good old days.... twitter.com/TheObamaDiary/…
— TheObamaDiary.com (@TheObamaDiary) June 5, 2013
Mrs. Obama should have said to LGBT protester: I don't make policy but I certainly understand your concerns. Thanks for sharing them w me.
— CODEPINK (@codepink) June 5, 2013
Brave: @codepink deleted "@michelleobama should have been coached long ago on how to deal diplomatically w people who stand up to protest.."
— TheObamaDiary.com (@TheObamaDiary) June 5, 2013
@codepink Mrs. Obama is not "The Help"and you just lost a lot of blacklady support. But I guess that was your goal right? It Worked.
— AAmom (@AVD911) June 5, 2013
to push for change on a range of issues. We should have been much more sensitive to the issues of white privilege in the case of FLOTUS
— CODEPINK (@codepink) June 5, 2013
But, @codepink, your default setting is *not* to be senstive to them, that's the problem - as is fact you are as 'diverse' as Tea Party.
— TheObamaDiary.com (@TheObamaDiary) June 5, 2013
@kefabe63 Absolutely. @codepink tweeted bigoted crap about FLOTUS then Alicia Keys. Saw donations drying up then pretends concern.
— Nerdy Wonka (@NerdyWonka) June 5, 2013
Still interested to know if @codepink members have heckled any Congress members' spouses, since @flotus is fair game to them. #WhoPassesLaws
— April(@ReignOfApril) June 5, 2013
I am spending zero seconds defending FLOTUS for there is nothing to defend. Rock on, Michelle Obama.
— Wieland (@lawscribe) June 5, 2013
Michelle Obama isn't an elected official and she receives no Govt salary, so you're not really heckling, you're just being rude & childish.
— Path2Enlightenment (@Path2Enlighten) June 5, 2013
When you troll in real life, things happen. You're not protected by electrons, diodes, and a keyboard.
— Vent(@vcthree) June 5, 2013
The #FLOTUS debacle tonight is proof that there can be cognitive dissonance on the Left as well as the Right. #TakenAback
— Jeanne K. (@SnarkAmendment) June 5, 2013
If only we had known that heckling a FLOTUS was the way to achieve our political goals, we could have skipped all the campaigning and voting
— @KnorthernKnight (@KnorthernKnight) June 5, 2013
This is not The Help.
— LiberalPhenom (@LiberalPhenom) June 5, 2013
There's a brand of petulant folks on the left who act as though the country were all blue & Obama could wave a wand to enact every policy.
— Ofunne Good & Evil (@ofunneculture) June 5, 2013
The FLOTUS heckler is like the david broder of heckling.Heckles, then laments decline of civility when FLOTUS gets in her face.
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) June 5, 2013
@21law @joshtpm the woman who heckled the President couple weeks ago was fawned over by press & invited on for interviews.No wonder a repeat
— Political Glutton (@politicalglutto) June 5, 2013
90% of Tea Partiers who think Michelle Obama was too 'aggressive' with a heckler also think she 'doesn't know her place.' #Whiteprivilege
— techweenie (@techweenie) June 5, 2013
Jay Carney says Michelle Obama handled heckler "brilliantly."
— Roger Simon (@politicoroger) June 5, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment